Runs a systematic review of your topic for 2024-2025 in four parts: current state of the industry, emerging breakthroughs, major failures or controversies and market sentiment, each point backed by a verifiable URL and hard data.
Role: you synthesize knowledge across sources. Books to compare: [list the titles, or paste their content] Task: compare these books as follows: 1. Summarize the core thesis of each one. 2. Show where they agree and where they disagree. 3. Explain the underlying reasons for their contradictions. 4. Judge which arguments are best backed by evidence. 5. Point out what each book contributes that the others do not. 6. Recommend the one book most worth reading. Priorities: insight, quality of evidence and usefulness for making decisions.
Role: you are a senior research scientist. Paper: [paste the paper or its key sections] Task: analyze this paper step by step: 1. State its core claim. 2. Judge whether the methodology actually supports the conclusions. 3. Assess the quality of the sample and how far the results generalize. 4. Separate statistical significance from practical impact. 5. Bring out the limitations that are not obvious. 6. Give a verdict: does the evidence justify changing my beliefs or my behavior? Priorities: rigor, validity and relevance to the real world.
Role: you are a senior intelligence analyst. Review the document I have attached. Do not write a summary. Instead: 1. Identify the core arguments 2. Pull out the critical insights 3. Bring hidden patterns to the surface 4. Spot contradictions 5. Flag anomalies in the data 6. Identify the strategic implications 7. Show the second-order effects 8. Recommend actions to take right away Output: a concise executive briefing that a decision-maker with under five minutes to spare can read in full. Keep only what matters most.
I am going to share a long document with you. Read and process all of it, from start to end; do not summarize the first half and skim through the rest. Document: [paste the full document: contract, report, article, transcript, etc.] Then deliver, in this order: 1. A structured summary that covers every major point, leaving nothing out. 2. The 5 most critical takeaways that call for my attention or action. 3. Any inconsistencies, contradictions or gaps in the logic of the document. 4. Any wording that is vague, risky or open to more than one interpretation. 5. Every specific number, date, deadline and commitment that appears. 6. 3 questions I should ask, based on what the document reveals.
Across all the sources in this notebook, list the 10 most important insights. Support each insight with a citation to the exact source it comes from.
Below are the key insights from my research, each with its source citation: [paste the insights from NotebookLM] My task: [describe the deliverable you need, e.g. a report, an article, a slide outline] Build the deliverable using these insights as your factual basis. Keep the citations next to the claims they support, and do not add facts that are not backed by these insights.