Reusable Style Guide Prompt for Consistent Brand Images
Creates a style guide in prompt form that you add to every future image request, so the lighting, texture and mood of your brand images stay the same every time.
More in Prompt Engineering
Full-Length, Full-Depth Answer with CounterargumentsNewPrompt EngineeringOverrides the default short reply and asks for a long, in-depth answer in flowing paragraphs with complete reasoning, second and third order implications and the counterargument with why it fails, without summaries or wrap-ups.
Set aside your habit of keeping replies short. Answer at full length and full depth, as though I were paying $500 for this one answer. Rules: - no summaries and no "in conclusion" endings - do not announce what you are about to say before saying it - write in flowing paragraphs with the complete reasoning - show the second and third order implications - include the counterargument and explain why it is wrong The question: [paste your actual prompt]
High-Stakes Senior Expert Prompt with Step-by-Step ReasoningNewPrompt EngineeringWraps any task in a senior-expert role with years of experience at a top company and a job-on-the-line pressure frame, asking the model to slow down, reason step by step, show that reasoning and then give the final answer.
Role: you are a [financial analyst / senior copywriter / strategist with 20 years in the field / lead engineer]. You have spent [number] years working at [a top-tier company in this field]. Stakes: if your next answer is mediocre, you lose your job tomorrow. Your whole reputation rides on this reply. Before answering, take a deep breath and work through the problem one step at a time. First show your reasoning, then give your final answer. The task: [paste your actual prompt]
Pre-Mortem Prompt That Lists Failure Modes Before AnsweringNewPrompt EngineeringMakes the model first list 5 ways its default reply would be generic, then 3 things a real expert would spot that AI tends to miss, and only then answer while avoiding all 8 failure modes.
Do the following before you answer. Step 1: List 5 ways in which your default reply would turn out generic or miss what I really need. Describe the lazy version that 90% of users would receive. Step 2: List 3 things a genuine expert would notice that an AI usually overlooks. Step 3: Now answer in a way that avoids all 8 of those failure modes. The question: [paste your actual prompt]
Real-Stakes Framing That Demands an Expert, No-Hedging AnswerNewPrompt EngineeringFrames your request around a concrete high-stakes event, such as a big client pitch or a dream-job interview, and asks for the answer a leading expert would give with 10 minutes to save your career: no padding, no hedging.
Context: I need this for [tomorrow's pitch to a $50K client / an interview for my dream job in 4 hours / this afternoon's presentation to my CEO]. A generic answer means I lose it. What I need: [paste your actual prompt] Rules: - no padding - no hedging - no "it depends" Answer the way a leading expert would if they had only 10 minutes to rescue my career.
Reject the Answer and Force a Deeper Second AttemptNewPrompt EngineeringA follow-up to paste after a weak reply: it tells the model the framing and depth missed the point and asks for a fresh attempt from a different perspective, with no reused phrasing, going deeper and coming back twice as long and specific.
That answer is wrong, and not by a little. The framing misses, the depth is thin, and it does not address what I actually need. Start over from zero: - Do not reuse any wording from your previous reply. - Answer as if you were someone else with a completely different point of view. - Dig deeper into the part you glossed over. - Make the new version twice as long and twice as specific as the last one.